Sometimes, trying to untangle the meaning of statutes can make you want to tear your hair out. Even Justice Samuel Alito acknowledged as much during the U.S. Supreme Court oral arguments in Perry v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd. This case arose under 5 U.S.C. §7703 and addresses whether certain Merit Systems Protection Board decisions should be reviewed in district courts or in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Justice Alito prompted laughter in the courtroom when he remarked,
[T]he one thing about this case that seems perfectly clear to me is that nobody who is not a lawyer, and no ordinary lawyer could read these statutes and figure out what they are supposed to do. … This is unbelievably complicated. … Who wrote this statute? Somebody who takes pleasure out of pulling the wings off flies?
We at O’Connor’s don’t take pleasure out of pulling the wings off flies, but we do enjoy providing practitioners with the cases and annotations you need to quickly assess the issues in your own cases. The O’Connor’s federal and Texas annotated codes series were designed specifically for that purpose.
You will find Perry and thousands of other annotations interpreting and applying federal and Texas laws—from federal employment codes to Texas oil-and-gas statutes and regulations—in our annotated code series, available at our online store. We’ll try to minimize the frustration for you … and protect the flies.
 Docket No. 16-399.
 Transcript of Oral Argument at 42, Perry v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd. (2017) (No. 16-399).